*Reassuringly dull cyber security

Claims for compensation for data breaches

Back

A GDPR & Data Protection Advisory Note.

Published: 11/11/2019 Last amended: 11/11/2019

SUMMARY
• Anyone who is victim of data breach is entitled to claim compensation
• No need to suffer any financial loss or distress
• Compensation is for the fact of the breach alone

DETAIL

Background
On 2 October 2019 the Court of Appeal made a landmark decision (in the case of Lloyd v Google). This case has several significant features:

  1. There are, potentially, several million claimants
  2. The total compensation claim is estimated to be between £1-£3bn
  3. It does not involve actually identifying all the claimants ‘up front’. (The plan is to litigate first and secure the compensation pot, then invite people to come forwards to demonstrate that they are entitled to some slice of it).

However, this Note will focus on is what the Court decided about what those whose data has, allegedly needed to show in order to be entitled to any damages (compensation).

No loss or harm needed
In this case it’s not being claimed that anyone has suffered any financial loss or other concrete harm. In fact, it’s not even alleged that anyone has suffered any distress or anxiety whatsoever. Compensation is being claimed simply for the fact of the alleged breach alone.

The Court decided that data is ‘property’ which had a value and that where a data breach causes someone to lose control over their personal data/property they are entitled to be compensated for the loss of value of that data/property – regardless of any loss or distress.

This decision doesn’t mean that every data breach automatically entitles anyone to be compensated. The Court confirmed the de minimis threshold applies and that threshold would exclude a claim arising from an accidental one-off data breach that was quickly remedied.

Conclusion
This decision is a very big deal and can be summarised as: ‘You breach, you pay’. Google are appealing to the Supreme Court.


Disclaimer
This note, which is based on various sources including the ICO, is for information purposes only. It is not intended to be a source of legal advice and must not be relied upon as such.

Appointing NormCyber as our virtual DPO has given Ferrero the best of both worlds – access to data protection experts who understand what we stand for as a business, without the hefty overheads usually associated with appointing an in-house DPO.

Harpreet Thandi
Regional Counsel, UK & Ireland, Ferrero

We were looking for a virtual DPO service that offered all of the benefits of a fully qualified data protection lawyer, without the overheads of an in-house hire. The DPaaS solution from norm. has been invaluable in helping us to ensure we respect the integrity of our customers’ personal information, while using it to continue to deliver differentiated products and services which support our growing customer base.

Mike Whitfield, Compliance Manager
Marmalade

CSaaS allows me to step away from multi-vendor management as the Security Operations Centre coordinates all of the technology for me.

David Vincent, CTO
Perpetuum

We were in the market for an independent Data Protection Officer service that was well versed with both UK and EU regulators. We’re thrilled to have acquired this service knowing that an expert is available 24/7.

Suzanne McCabe, Head of Project Management
James Hambro & Partners

Norm’s penetration testing layer, along with the suite of CSaaS modules has enabled MA to exceed all its audit requirements for its major clients.

Rob Elisha, ICT and CRM Manager
Montreal Associates

The speed of your Data Protection Officer’s response was very impressive – it was far quicker than I would have expected even from an in-house DPO

Will Blake, Director of Technology and Analytics
CRU Group